Policies

Accessibility statement

The University of Leicester’s Accessibility statement is a live document, providing an open account of our current position. This statement applies to all content available on the le.ac.uk domain and suppliers/third parties including jobs.le.ac.uk.

Our websites (including le.ac.uk) and Digital Learning Environment (DLE) are run by the University of Leicester. The largest part of our DLE is our Virtual Learning Environment (VLE); a service provided by Blackboard. We are currently using Blackboard Learn SaaS.

Our VLE contains the majority of our learning and teaching resources and activities and has a user community of 4,143 people who can create content (as at May 2022). There are over 15,184 Blackboard course sites provided for teaching, containing over two million content items.

We want as many people as possible to be able to use these websites. For example, that means you should be able to:

  • Magnify the page to 300% or more without the text spilling off the screen;
  • Navigate most of the website using only a keyboard;
  • Access alternative text for images and other non-textual content;
  • Listen to most of the website using a screen reader (including the most recent versions of JAWS, NVDA and VoiceOver).

We work with our suppliers to review the accessibility of third party content on our website and phase out their use where these are inaccessible. We make assessments when the supplier contracts are up for renewal, and check third party content for accessibility at that time.

Non-accessible content

The accessibility regulations do not require us to fix PDFs or other documents published before 23 September 2018 if they’re not essential to providing our services. For example, we do not plan to update teaching materials created for use in course delivery prior to 23 September 2018.

Any new PDFs or Word documents we publish will meet accessibility standards.

We use Panopto to create and share recorded learning materials. Panopto provides good quality captions through automated speech recognition. Although, as with any automated system, they are not 100% accurate. Following analysis of the number of hours recorded, and experience from other institutions of the time required to manually correct captions, we estimate it would take 76,225 person hours to edit the captions to ‘human levels’ of accuracy.

To mitigate the fact that captions will not be 100% accurate, we are providing guidance for staff on how to optimise the quality of captions in their recordings.

Staff will direct students to alternative, text-based sources of information in cases where the captions are not of sufficiently good quality. We are establishing a process for students to report problems experienced when using recordings because the captions are not adequate. In addition, we will continue working with Panopto to improve quality over time. We have established a process for staff to request more accurate, paid for captions where funding is available.

We do not plan to add captions to live video streams because live video is exempt from meeting the accessibility regulations.

Panopto captions

We use Panopto to create and share recorded learning materials. Panopto provides good quality captions through automated speech recognition. Although, as with any automated system, they are not 100% accurate. Following analysis of the number of hours recorded, and experience from other institutions of the time required to manually correct captions, we estimate it would take 76,225 person hours to edit the captions to ‘human levels’ of accuracy. Given this position the University considers this area of content as a disproportionate burden to maintain to WCAG standards (WCAG 3.1.1).

To mitigate the fact that captions will not be 100% accurate, we are providing guidance for staff on how to optimise the quality of captions in their recordings.

Staff will direct students to alternative, text-based sources of information in cases where the captions are not of sufficiently good quality. We are establishing a process for students to report problems experienced when using recordings because the captions are not adequate. In addition, we will continue working with Panopto to improve quality over time. We have established a process for staff to request more accurate, paid for captions where funding is available.

Live video

We do not plan to add captions to live video streams because live video is exempt from meeting the accessibility regulations.

ReCAPTCHA

We use a reCAPTCHA service on jobs.le.ac.uk in order to protect the website from spam and abuse whilst letting valid users use the site. This is a vital security tool that prevents automated software from engaging with the site. A specific language has not been detailed within the reCAPTCHA software which may mean that some assistive technologies are less accurate. Whilst the reCAPTCHA software is used on jobs.le.ac.uk, it is owned by an alternative third party provider and we are unable to make this change to satisfy the WCAG standard (WCAG 3.1.1) without introducing a significant security risk.

Feedback and contact information

Please email webupdates@le.ac.uk if you need information on this website in a different format such as accessible PDF, large print, easy-read audio recording or Braille. We’ll consider your request and respond. We are committed to ensuring all users can access our web services.

Technical information about this website’s accessibility

The University of Leicester is committed to making its website accessible, in accordance with the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018.

Reporting accessibility problems with this website

We are always looking to improve the accessibility of our websites. Please email webupdates@le.ac.uk if you find any problems not listed in our statement or think we’re not meeting accessibility requirements, providing as much information as possible. We will always review, investigate, communicate our findings, and work with you to resolve issues affecting your use of our services.

Enforcement procedure

If you need to escalate your issue with the public website further, please contact the Director of Human Resources, Emma Stevens, or our Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Pofessional Services).

PA to Deputy Vice-Chancellor (Professional Services): ja44@leicester.ac.uk

PA to Director of Human Resources: jca29@leicester.ac.uk

If you need to escalate your issue with VLE further, please contact the University Pro-Vice Chancellor Education, Professor Elizabeth Jones.

PA to Pro-Vice Chancellor Education: nicole.hamilton@leicester.ac.uk

You can expect an acknowledgement within six working days and a full reply within 20 working days. If your complaint raises complex issues that cannot be answered within 20 working days, we will keep you informed of progress until we can fully respond.

The Equality and Human Rights Commission (EHRC) is responsible for enforcing the Public Sector Bodies (Websites and Mobile Applications) (No. 2) Accessibility Regulations 2018 (the ‘accessibility regulations’). If you’re not happy with how we respond to your complaint, contact the Equality Advisory and Support Service (EASS).

Compliance status

This website is partially compliant with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines version 2.1 AA standard. 

How we test our websites

  • We have audited our main University website (le.ac.uk) using WCAG 2.1 AA standards, and have implemented improvements;
  • We assessed the content types, page templates and components that are available to a content editor when populating the site;
  • Once we had a good understanding of the available content types, we created a series of test pages that cover these different elements. Not all pages were accurate representations of real content pages, as they used a large number of components on each page. However, they enabled us to efficiently check for technical issues.

How we test our VLE

Blackboard’s products are designed and developed in accordance with the internationally-recognised Web Content Accessibility (WCAG) Guidelines 2.1 AA as well as the Section 508 standards in the United States. A third party conducts regular audits of its software to ensure quality expectations are met and maintained. Read Blackboard's Accessibility statement.

What we’re doing to improve accessibility 

We have disseminated guides to colleagues on how to make accessible digital content and are providing training to content creators.

Our VLE uses Blackboard Ally – released at the end of November 2019 – to audit our content in the VLE. We have worked with our suppliers to review all linked tools and will phase out use where these are inaccessible. We will make another assessment when the supplier contracts are up for renewal, and check for accessibility at that time.

The University has adopted SensusAccess, a self-service re-formatting tool. Using SensusAccess, students and staff can convert an electronic document to an alternative format. It is quick, easy to use, and completely free.

Third-party content 

To help accessibility compliance across the higher education and further education sectors, the University of Leicester supports searchBOX, a centralised, independent directory of third-party accessibility information.

searchBOX catalogues the contact information and accessibility statements of third-party suppliers, enables the sharing of community-generated accessibility statements, and allows users to map their supplier ecosystem.  The University of Leicester encourages all our partners and suppliers to support this effort by ensuring their accessibility information is included in the searchBOX directory.

Visit the searchBOX directory to view supplier accessibility statements

Digitised third-party content

Where the University of Leicester provides digitisations of published print content (via the reading list system linked to from the VLE, or in departmental course packs), these scans are formatted as PDF files and processed to the following minimum standards using Adobe Acrobat DC:

  • Ensure copyright compliance;
  • Scanned at 600 dpi resolution;
  • All required pages in the correct order and including foot and end notes;
  • Uniform page sizes;
  • Removing blank pages;
  • Selecting black and white and/or colour as appropriate;
  • Appling Optical Character Recognition (OCR) in the original language;
  • OCR to the level Editable Text and Image where possible (to enable search within content);
  • Adding author and title to file properties;
  • Ensuring compatible security settings of PDFs do not interfere with assistive technology.

My UoL, Accessibility

MyUoL is the mobile app used by the University of Leicester. The mobile platform itself is called MyDay and is provided by a third party supplier, Collabco. MyUoL is the branded name for this instantiation of MyDay.

MyDay is a mobile platform which can be configured by user and in more detail by University staff with admin access to the platform.

Collabco have invested a lot of effort over the past 18 months in making their platform more accessible and have been audited by DIG (June 2020).

Read information on the Accessibility Road map for the platform including the accessibility statement for MyDay.

In summary MyDay is partially compliant with the Web Content Accessibility Guidelines version 2.1 AA standard and all exceptions are detailed in the statement.

MyDay is configurable by the user including foreground, text and background colours of text boxes/tiles etc. Guidance is provided by Collabco so that users and admins can make their content compliant to the accessibility standards (AA and AAA).

As a client, the University of Leicester are able to develop bespoke apps within the platform using the supplier SDK and tooling. Guidance on how to make these bespoke apps accessible under standard.

An initial scan of the MyUoL has been performed using deque axe and the majority of non-compliance/advisory reports are to do with the contrast on the application ‘tiles’. Work is being undertaken to correct these by ITS and ERD who have admin access to the platforms dashboard and tiles.

Other issues are either already under the exceptions list documented in the supplier’s accessibility statement or a result of developing bespoke apps with in the platform. Work is currently being undertaken to refactor these apps to ensure they are as compliant as possible in terms of the supplier’s accessibility statement.

Preparation of this accessibility statement

This statement was prepared on 20 September 2019. It was last reviewed and updated on 26 July 2024.

This website’s accessibility is tested weekly. These tests are carried out by Monsido.

Back to top
MENU